🔗 Share this article

The celebrated author Jilly Cooper, who died suddenly at the age of 88, achieved sales of 11 million copies of her many epic books over her 50-year writing career. Beloved by every sensible person over a certain age (45), she was introduced to a new generation last year with the TV adaptation of Rivals.

The Rutshire Chronicles

Cooper purists would have preferred to watch the Rutshire chronicles in sequence: beginning with Riders, first published in 1985, in which the character Rupert Campbell-Black, scoundrel, philanderer, horse rider, is initially presented. But that’s a side note – what was notable about watching Rivals as a box set was how effectively Cooper’s world had stood the test of time. The chronicles distilled the 1980s: the shoulder pads and bubble skirts; the preoccupation with social class; nobility looking down on the flashy new money, both ignoring everyone else while they snipped about how warm their bubbly was; the gender dynamics, with inappropriate behavior and assault so routine they were practically figures in their own right, a double act you could rely on to move the plot along.

While Cooper might have inhabited this age completely, she was never the proverbial fish not perceiving the ocean because it’s everywhere. She had a compassion and an observational intelligence that you maybe wouldn’t guess from her public persona. All her creations, from the canine to the horse to her mother and father to her international student's relative, was always “utterly charming” – unless, that is, they were “truly heavenly”. People got harassed and further in Cooper’s work, but that was never OK – it’s astonishing how acceptable it is in many more highbrow books of the period.

Background and Behavior

She was upper-middle-class, which for practical purposes meant that her dad had to earn an income, but she’d have characterized the classes more by their values. The bourgeoisie anxiously contemplated about every little detail, all the time – what other people might think, mostly – and the elite didn’t care a … well “stuff”. She was raunchy, at times incredibly so, but her prose was always refined.

She’d describe her family life in idyllic language: “Father went to Dunkirk and Mummy was extremely anxious”. They were both completely gorgeous, engaged in a lifelong love match, and this Cooper emulated in her own partnership, to a businessman of war books, Leo Cooper. She was 24, he was 27, the union wasn’t perfect (he was a philanderer), but she was never less than at ease giving people the secret for a blissful partnership, which is squeaky bed but (key insight), they’re creaking with all the laughter. He avoided reading her books – he picked up Prudence once, when he had flu, and said it made him feel unwell. She didn’t mind, and said it was mutual: she wouldn’t be spotted reading battle accounts.

Constantly keep a journal – it’s very difficult, when you’re mid-twenties, to remember what age 24 felt like

Early Works

Prudence (1978) was the fifth book in the Romance collection, which commenced with Emily in 1975. If you approached Cooper backwards, having begun in the main series, the early novels, alternatively called “those ones named after posh girls” – also Imogen and Harriet – were close but no cigar, every protagonist feeling like a trial version for Campbell-Black, every female lead a little bit drippy. Plus, chapter for chapter (Without exact data), there was less sex in them. They were a bit uptight on matters of decorum, women always worrying that men would think they’re promiscuous, men saying ridiculous comments about why they preferred virgins (comparably, seemingly, as a genuine guy always wants to be the initial to open a container of Nescafé). I don’t know if I’d recommend reading these stories at a impressionable age. I thought for a while that that was what the upper class really thought.

They were, however, extremely tightly written, high-functioning romances, which is much harder than it seems. You lived Harriet’s unwanted pregnancy, Bella’s difficult family-by-marriage, Emily’s Scottish isolation – Cooper could guide you from an desperate moment to a jackpot of the emotions, and you could never, even in the beginning, identify how she managed it. One minute you’d be smiling at her meticulously detailed accounts of the bedding, the subsequently you’d have tears in your eyes and uncertainty how they got there.

Literary Guidance

Inquired how to be a author, Cooper frequently advised the sort of advice that the literary giant would have said, if he could have been arsed to guide a novice: employ all five of your perceptions, say how things smelled and looked and heard and tactile and tasted – it significantly enhances the prose. But perhaps more practical was: “Forever keep a diary – it’s very difficult, when you’re twenty-five, to recollect what being 24 felt like.” That’s one of the first things you detect, in the more detailed, more populated books, which have numerous female leads rather than just a single protagonist, all with extremely posh names, unless they’re American, in which case they’re called a simple moniker. Even an years apart of a few years, between two sisters, between a gentleman and a female, you can hear in the conversation.

The Lost Manuscript

The backstory of Riders was so exactly characteristically Cooper it might not have been real, except it certainly was real because London’s Evening Standard made a public request about it at the time: she finished the whole manuscript in 1970, long before the Romances, took it into the West End and misplaced it on a public transport. Some context has been purposely excluded of this tale – what, for case, was so significant in the city that you would forget the only copy of your book on a bus, which is not that far from leaving your baby on a train? Certainly an rendezvous, but which type?

Cooper was inclined to embellish her own chaos and ineptitude